avatar
Bug bounty
Public

BigBlueButton Bug Bounty Program

BigBlueButton is the leading open-source virtual classroom software, purpose-built for world-class online teaching organizations. At BigBlueButton, our platform offers features such as video, live chat, an interactive whiteboard, learning analytics, emojis, breakout rooms, and collaborative tools. Designed with a focus on education, our platform is ideal for remote learning, virtual classrooms, online training, and webinars.

Reward

Bounty
Hall of fame
€100
Low
€500
Medium
€1,000
High
€2,000
Critical
€5,000

Program

Avg reward
-
Max reward
-

Scopes
7
Supported languages
English

Hacktivity

Reports
22
1st response
< 1 day
Reports last 24h
1
Reports last week
22
Reports this month
-

About BigBlueButton

BigBlueButton is the leading open-source virtual classroom software, purpose-built for world-class online teaching organizations. Unlike traditional video conferencing applications, BigBlueButton understands the goal of the virtual classroom is not to meet, but to learn. By focusing on pedagogy applied learning and live analytics, BigBlueButton improves learner outcomes for every virtual class.

At BigBlueButton, our platform offers features such as video, live chat, an interactive whiteboard, learning analytics, emojis, breakout rooms, and collaborative tools. Designed with a focus on education, our platform is ideal for remote learning, virtual classrooms, online training, and webinars.

BigBlueButton is integrated into learning management systems (LMS), including but not limited to Moodle, Canvas, Sakai, and Schoology. As a completely open-source project, BigBlueButton was created by a community of dedicated developers passionate about helping improve online learning. It is constantly evolving and improving through a dedicated, growing international user and developer community.

About the scope

This program is limited to a specific list of assets :

Reports about other assets won't be eligible for reward and only issues that can be reproduced on the latest stable version will be considered.

Documentation

You may find everything you need to understand how to setup and use our assets in our (ressource center)[https://docs.bigbluebutton.org/].

For a swift setup you may use bbb-install.sh or our docker. Of course, make sure you're using the latest stable version in any case.

Program rules

About report's content

To be eligible, your reports must include the hereafter information :

  • General description of the issue
  • Details about the impacted function and specific conditions to be met, including the vulnerable code snippet
  • Impacted version
  • A step by step proof of concept allowing to reliably reproduce the issue, including network exploitation
  • Recommendations and fix suggestions

A detailed template will be provided automatically when submitting a report, please stick to it. This will help us ensure a smooth and swift processing of your reports.

Mind that reports that do not follow the template’s guidelines won’t be eligible for reward. Abuse may lead to further sanctions (e.g. spamming or repeated submission of invalid reports).

Testing Policy, Responsible Disclosure

Please adhere to the following rules while performing research on this program:

  • Denial of service (DoS) attacks on our applications, servers, networks or infrastructure are strictly forbidden
  • All reports must be validated manually, submission from automated tools won't be considered and may lead to sanctions (code analysis tools, AI, …)
  • Targeting other users' instances is forbidden, only test against your own
  • DO NOT include Personally Identifiable Information (PII) in your report and please REDACT/OBFUSCATE the PII that is part of your PoC (screenshot, server response, JSON file, etc.) as much as possible.
  • Same with secrets, keys and credentials
  • No vulnerability disclosure, full, partial or otherwise, is allowed without prior agreement from us
  • Please avoid submitting security issues on our repositories before reporting it to this program, your report might be considered as a duplicate if a related submission already exists on our repositories
  • The following topics won’t be considered as a valid finding eligible for reward nonetheless, you’re welcome to suggest improvements about it through our repositories but not our bug bounty program :
    • Code improvements/code quality issues without security impact
    • Insecure default/basic configurations
    • Mistakes or lack of precision in our documentation

Furthermore, reports about behaviours that relies on leveraging a legitimate access as an administrator won't be considered for reward. Being administrator of a BigBlueButton realm grants extended rights which could be abused as for any application. Due to our threat model and context of use we won't consider reports that leverage legitimate administrator access under the assumption that the administrator may have malicious intent and could abuse his level of rights.

Reward Eligibility

We are happy to thank everyone who submits valid reports which help us improve the security, however only those that meet the following eligibility requirements may receive a monetary reward:

  • You must be the first reporter of a vulnerability
  • You must not break any of the testing policy rules listed above
  • You must not be a former or current employee nor a maintainer of our project or one of its contractors
  • The vulnerability must be a qualifying vulnerability
  • The report must contain the following elements:
    • Clear textual description of the vulnerability, how it can be exploited, the security impact it has on the application, its users and the company, and remediation advice on fixing the vulnerability
    • Proof of exploitation: screenshots demonstrating the exploit was performed, and showing the final impact
    • Provide complete steps with the necessary information to reproduce the exploit, including (if necessary) code snippets, payloads, commands etc
  • Identical vulnerabilities present in different versions will be considered as a single issue/will warrant a single reward
  • Multiple vulnerabilities caused by one underlying issue will be considered as a single issue/will warrant a single reward

Reward amounts are based on:

  • Reward grid of the report's scope
  • CVSS scoring and actual business impact of the vulnerability upon performing risk analysis

Reward

Asset value CVSS
Low
CVSS
Medium
CVSS
High
CVSS
Critical
High
€500€1,000€2,000€5,000
Medium
€100€500€1,000€3,000

Systemic issues

1st report100%
2nd report100%
3rd report75%
4th report50%
5th report25%
6th+ report10%

We appreciate all valid reports submitted to our program that enhance our security. However, please note that if a similar issue (see definition in 'More info') has already been reported, by you or any other hunter, the reward will be decreasing according to these percentages.


Scopes

ScopeTypeAsset value
https://github.com/bigbluebutton/bigbluebutton
Open Source
High
Low
€500
Medium
€1,000
High
€2,000
Critical
€5,000
https://github.com/blindsidenetworks/scalelite
Open Source
High
Low
€500
Medium
€1,000
High
€2,000
Critical
€5,000
https://github.com/bigbluebutton/bbb-webrtc-sfu
Open Source
High
Low
€500
Medium
€1,000
High
€2,000
Critical
€5,000
https://github.com/bigbluebutton/bbb-webrtc-recorder
Open Source
High
Low
€500
Medium
€1,000
High
€2,000
Critical
€5,000
https://github.com/bigbluebutton/greenlight
Open Source
Medium
Low
€100
Medium
€500
High
€1,000
Critical
€3,000
https://github.com/bigbluebutton/bbb-presentation-video
Open Source
Medium
Low
€100
Medium
€500
High
€1,000
Critical
€3,000
https://github.com/bigbluebutton/bbb-playback
Open Source
Medium
Low
€100
Medium
€500
High
€1,000
Critical
€3,000

Out of scopes

  • Any asset that is not explicitly included in our program's scope
  • Any third parties’ or Community’s assets that are not explicitly included (e.g. forks, libraries or packages)
  • Any depreciated versions and other versions than the current stable/official version are considered out of scope except if specified otherwise in the program’s rules
  • Any local implementation of the project/implementation belonging to third parties

Vulnerability types

Qualifying vulnerabilities

  • SQL Injection (SQLi)
  • Cross-Site Scripting (XSS)
  • Remote Code Execution (RCE)
  • Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR)
  • Horizontal and vertical privilege escalation
  • Authentication bypass & broken authentication
  • Business Logic Errors vulnerability with real security impact
  • Local files access and manipulation (LFI, RFI, XXE, SSRF, XSPA)
  • Cross-Origin Resource Sharing (CORS) with real security impact
  • Cross-site Request Forgery (CSRF) with real security impact
  • Open Redirect
  • Cryptographic flaws (e.g. using insecure crypto primitives, insufficient randomness, incorrect handling of keys, …)
  • Memory corruption or safety issues (e.g. use-after-free, double free, aliasing, out-of-bounds access, …)
  • Missing validations of untrusted inputs (e.g. injection of unescaped markup in output, following untrusted symlinks, …)
  • Undefined behavior leading to a security vulnerability (e.g. integer overflow)
  • Race conditions (e.g. time-of-check-to-time-of-use races on file system checks)
  • Exposed secrets, credentials or sensitive information from an in-scope asset and affecting at least one of our scopes

Non-qualifying vulnerabilities

  • Tabnabbing
  • Content/Text injections
  • Clickjacking/UI redressing
  • Denial of Service (DoS) attacks
  • Recently disclosed CVEs (less than 30 days since patch release)
  • CVEs without exploitable vulnerabilities and PoC
  • Open ports or services without exploitable vulnerabilities and PoC
  • Social engineering of staff or contractors
  • Presence of autocomplete attribute on web forms
  • Vulnerabilities affecting outdated browsers or platforms
  • Self-XSS or XSS that cannot be used to impact other users
  • Any hypothetical flaw or best practices without exploitable vulnerabilities and PoC
  • SSL/TLS issues (e.g. expired certificates, best practices)
  • Unexploitable vulnerabilities (e.g. Self-XSS, XSS or Open Redirect through HTTP headers...)
  • Reports with attack scenarios requiring MITM or physical access to victim's device
  • Missing security-related HTTP headers which do not lead directly to an exploitable vulnerability and PoC
  • Low severity Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) (e.g. Unauthenticated / Logout / Login / Products cart updates...)
  • Session management issues (e.g. lack of expiration, no logout on password change, concurrent sessions)
  • Disclosure of information without exploitable vulnerabilities and PoC (e.g. stack traces, path disclosure, directory listings, software versions, IP disclosure, 3rd party secrets, EXIF Metadata, Origin IP)
  • CSV injection
  • Malicious file upload (e.g. EICAR files, .EXE)
  • Blind SSRF without exploitable vulnerabilities and PoC (e.g. DNS & HTTP pingback, Wordpress XMLRPC)
  • Lack or bypass of rate-limiting, brute-forcing or captcha issues
  • User enumeration (e.g. email, alias, GUID, phone number, common CMS endpoints)
  • Weak password policies (e.g. length, complexity, reuse)
  • Ability to spam users (email / SMS / direct messages flooding)
  • Password reset token sent via HTTP referer to external services (e.g. analytics / ads platforms)
  • Pre-account takeover (e.g. account creation via oAuth)
  • Exploits that rely on non standard configurations too distant from normal use cases or official recommendations
  • Exploits that rely on a voluntarily downgraded configuration
  • Stolen secrets, credentials or information gathered from a third-party asset that we have no control over
  • Exposed secrets, credentials or information on an out of scope asset
  • Issues relying on legitimate access as a user with administrator rights

Reports of leaks and exposed credentials

In the context of this program, we do not intend to encourage, accept or reward reports of leaks that are not applicable to our program’s scope and policy. To summarize our policy, you may refer to the below table:

Type of leak
Source of leak is in-scope
Source of leak belongs to the Organization and is out-of-scope
Source of leak does not belong to the Organization and is out-of-scope
Impact is in-scope (e.g. valid credentials on an in-scope asset)
checked Eligible
checked Not eligible
checked Not eligible
Impact is out-of-scope (e.g. valid credentials for an out-of-scope asset)
checked Not eligible
checked Not eligible
checked Not eligible

Hunters collaboration

When submitting new report, you can add up to 5 collaborators, and define the reward split ratio.

For more information, see help center.
Note: For reports that have already been rewarded, it is not possible to redistribute the rewards.

To submit a vulnerability report, you need to login with your hunter account.